Sensory Integration Discussion with OT faculty John Pagano

 

Sensory Integration Needs to Evolve

We would like to share this blog discussion from: John Pagano, a renowned member of Education Resources’ Faculty
 
John is teaching his popular conference:
Effectively Treat Behavior in Children with Autism Spectrum and Other Sensory Challenges
September 20-21, 2013 – Orland Park, IL
October 18-19, 2013 – Cedar Knolls, NJ
November 8-9, 2013 – Hollywood, FL
Please click above for full course details, to download to register and the option to register.
 
Following its initial development by A. J. Ayres, Sensory Integration Intervention has been slowly evolving.   As a result of this slow evolution, two major problems threaten the sensory integration frame of reference.
First is the problematic discrediting of sensory integration research by some behaviorists and pediatricians who favor interventions that are too rigid or medication based to optimally help children.  Second is intervention borrowing sensory integration terminology with out adequate expertise in carrying out the strategies.  Increasing use of “brushing, sensory diets, sensory equipment, and comfort rooms” developed and used by teachers and mental health therapists with out adequate guidance from therapists trained in sensory integration significantly dilute the effectiveness of sensory integration intervention.

Read more here

We would welcome your thoughts and discussions, thank you

 

]]>

Sensory Strategies for the Classroom – OT’s please share your favorite tools

Sensory Strategies for the classroomAdvance Web – Occupational Therapy recently published therapists thoughts on what tools work best in helping children with sensory integration issues:

http://occupational-therapy.advanceweb.com/Web-Extras/Online-Extras/Sensory-Strategies-for-the-Classroom.aspx

We would love to hear about your tools and tips – please share them with us here.

]]>

Research: Evaluate Neurobehavioral Intervention Effects in VLBW Infants at 1 year

Comparing Two Motor Assessment Tools to Evaluate Neurobehavioral Intervention Effects in Very Low Birth Weight Infants at 1 Year

We would like to share this research article published in the APTA Physical Therapy Journal

Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are at increased risk for motor deficits, which may be reduced by early intervention programs. For detection of motor deficits, and to monitor intervention, different assessment tools are available. It is important to choose tools that are sensitive to evaluate the efficacy of intervention on motor outcome.

http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/early/2013/06/12/ptj.20120460.short?rss=1

]]>

Thank you – PTA Survey participants

We wanted to say a huge thank you to all the PTA’s who participated in our survey.
We are excited by the results and are beginning to develop exciting new products to meet your CEU needs.
Congratulations to Tim, Katie, Linda, Justin and Mitzi and Susan- winners of a $75 Amazon gift card

We always welcome your input. Please visit our blog, our Facebook page and Linked In Page, to post your thoughts, comments and any clinical challenges and cases: 

]]>

 

A FAB Sensory Behavioral Strategy for Kids with Autism

Guest Blogger
Faculty Member: John Pagano
A clinically affective strategy for children with Autism who engage in repetitive self-injurious behavior is the FAB Reinforce Sensory Match Strategy. The FAB Reinforce Sensory Match Strategy involves replacing the automatic sensory reinforcement that encourages repetitive self-injurious behaviors with matched sensory activities, while also reinforcing the child for refraining from the self-injurious behavior. The Sensory Profile and a sensory functional behavioral analysis assessment can help direct the intervention. The Sensory Profile alerts the therapist to definite difference in the child’s sensory processing that only occur in 1 out of 100 kids. The Sensory Functional Behavioral Analysis establishes base line data, determines the function served by the problematic behavior, and helps direct intervention. The Reinforce Sensory Match strategy is most effective with children who have significantly different sensory modulation styles and engage in self-injurious behavior only to obtain sensory input. The therapist hypothesizes the automatic sensory reinforcement the child is getting from the problematic behavior then offers adaptive equipment and sensory techniques that match it. For example, when the Sensory Profile and Sensory Functional Behavioral Analysis show that a child repetitively mouths his hand for sensory reinforcement the therapist analyzes whether the sensory reinforcement is oral input, touch on his fingers, or both. The client is then offered various mouth and hand touch activities, and a super chew toy is found to be his favorite. The child is offered the chewey to use whenever he wants, and is praised for not mouthing his hands for progressively longer periods of time. For particularly problematic behavior the FAB Reinforce Sensory Match Strategy can be one component of a functional behavior plan written jointly by a Certified Behavior Analyst and Licensed Occupational Therapist. References:
Dunn, W. (2007). Supporting children to participate successfully in everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infants & Young Children, 20(2), 84-101.
Higbee, T.S., Chang, S., Endicott, K. (2005). Noncontingent access to preferred sensory stimuli as a treatment for automatically reinforced stereotypy. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 177-184.

Effectively Treat Behavior in Children with Autism Spectrum and Other Sensory Challenges
Please click here for course description and scheduled dates 

]]>